2015-12-03 20:25:07 +0000 <montanonic> That makes sense
2015-12-03 20:25:10 +0000 <montanonic> Okay.
2015-12-03 20:44:24 +0000nkaretnikov(~nikita@unaffiliated/nkar)
2015-12-03 20:50:26 +0000MSiep(~Thunderbi@104.200.151.29)
2015-12-03 21:09:21 +0000wolftune(~aaron@75-164-147-136.ptld.qwest.net)
2015-12-03 21:11:52 +0000mray(~mray@2a02:228:300:1::119)
2015-12-03 21:16:42 +0000 <wolftune> montanonic: chreekat: BrowserId/Persona not only requires JS, it requires third-party stuff currently in a level that RMS specifically objected to. It was RMS' request we were serving when we first added HashDB support
2015-12-03 21:16:46 +0000 <wolftune> just for reference
2015-12-03 21:17:05 +0000 <montanonic> wolftune: Thanks for pointing that out. Helpful to know.
2015-12-03 21:17:06 +0000chreekatnods
2015-12-03 21:17:29 +0000MSiep(~Thunderbi@104.200.151.29) (Ping timeout: 246 seconds)
2015-12-03 21:17:31 +0000 <wolftune> although I thought BrowserId/Persona was adequate for not being the objectionable silo stuff (i.e. not FaceBook)
2015-12-03 21:19:01 +0000jchmrt(~jchmrt@fsf/member/jchmrt) (Quit: Farewell)
2015-12-03 21:19:18 +0000 <wolftune> the other thing about auth is that we want to make anyone who would otherwie choose a Google login to use Persona because their experience is equally simple, basically identical, except that Persona fits our values better… I could imagine a "log in with Google" button that *actually* just is a duplicate false-front for Persona ;)
2015-12-03 21:19:20 +0000jchmrt(~jchmrt@fsf/member/jchmrt)
2015-12-03 21:29:19 +0000tdammers(~tdammers@77.109.109.32)
2015-12-03 21:29:20 +0000tdammers(~tdammers@77.109.109.32) (Changing host)
2015-12-03 21:29:20 +0000tdammers(~tdammers@unaffiliated/tdammers)
2015-12-03 21:50:47 +0000 <wolftune> mray: good day
2015-12-03 21:56:25 +0000singpolyma(~singpolym@CPE10feedfaaf7d-CM0c473d2b7590.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com) (Quit: Lost terminal)
2015-12-03 21:59:32 +0000MSiep(~Thunderbi@75-166-111-224.hlrn.qwest.net)
2015-12-03 22:10:51 +0000 <JazzyEagle> wolftune: mray: Please let me know if this is alright before I submit the MR: http://jazzyeagle.ddns.net:3000
2015-12-03 22:10:54 +0000MSiep(~Thunderbi@75-166-111-224.hlrn.qwest.net) (Remote host closed the connection)
2015-12-03 22:11:17 +0000 <wolftune> JazzyEagle: I don't think we want people browsing users
2015-12-03 22:11:36 +0000 <wolftune> I mean accessing it is one thing, but emphasizing it as a thing to do is kinda weird
2015-12-03 22:11:47 +0000 <wolftune> it's a bit prominent is all
2015-12-03 22:12:44 +0000 <JazzyEagle> wolftune: I understand, to a point. I can remove that. That's fine, however, I'm not sure where else such a link to /u would exist...
2015-12-03 22:12:48 +0000 <wolftune> JazzyEagle: why is the main site name and logo a link?
2015-12-03 22:13:04 +0000 <JazzyEagle> wolftune: Not sure. That's how mray had it.
2015-12-03 22:13:08 +0000 <wolftune> JazzyEagle: yeah, linking to /u is a discussion for another time, not priority
2015-12-03 22:13:21 +0000 <JazzyEagle> Ok, I'll remove it for now, then.
2015-12-03 22:14:00 +0000 <wolftune> JazzyEagle: the sign up/in link is missing some CSS or class or something, it's not got any right margin and is higher than the links on the left
2015-12-03 22:14:14 +0000 <mray> hi there
2015-12-03 22:14:18 +0000 <JazzyEagle> Heya, mray
2015-12-03 22:14:26 +0000 <mray> was about to say the same about the sign up link